Self Amplifying-mRNA and VEEV: Part 3
Are they going to use Mosquitoes to create positive PCR test results in livestock?
Men in Black runs on Caffeine and Plasma Rifles
(PayPal accepted)
Synopsis
In Self-Amplifying mRNA, Parts 1 & 2, we explored how vaccines use actual RNA Viral RdRP (RNA dependent RNA Polymerase) for multiple replication of desired antigens (eg: Spike protein). We also delved into Arcturus Therapeutics, and their new 1 Billion dose per year Japanese Joint-Venture called Arcalis, where they will produce ARCT-154, their Self-Amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine.
We also suggested that the actual, or modified, version of the Zelenko Protocol (Zinc + HCQ, EGCG, Quercetin..etc) very well could neutralize the function of sa-mRNA vaccines, rendering them useless, and exposing the entire pharmaceutical industries reasons for demonizing EARLY RdRP inhibiting treatments in order to protect their investment in sa-mRNA vaccines. We’ve also, in previous articles suggested strongly that “Disease X” is very likely H5N1, a virus with a historical 53% fatality rate in 880 victims.
With proper Zinc supplementation on a daily basis of 15-30mg of elemental Zinc (remember that Zinc Sulphate only has 21% elemental Zinc), and prepared to boost that amount, adding a potent Zinc Ionophore, we can likely mitigate the replication of ALL of the RNA Viruses, including H5N1.
With that, let’s embark on a totally new angle that has been bothering me. The VEEV Replicon (RdRP) that forms the backbone of the sa-mRNA ARCT-154 vaccine.
Treatment
VEEV as the RdRP Replicon for ARCT-154 sa-mRNA vaccines.
Ever since I read that Arcturus researchers had chosen the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV) as their RdRP (Replicon) backbone, I keep asking myself, “Why that particular RdRP Replicon?” Why not use an actual RdRP Replicon from an influenza virus, or from the actual SARS-2 virus? Why a mosquito-borne Encephalitis virus?
Bottom of Page 6:
“The ARCT-154 study vaccine consists of sa-mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles. The RNA comprises a replicon based upon Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) in which RNA coding for the VEEV structural proteins has been replaced with RNA coding for the full-length spike (S) glycoprotein of the SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant.”
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.13.23292597v1.full.pdf
Why is VEEV so controversial as a RdRP/Replicon backbone?
“Due to the ease of aerosolization and an extremely low infectious dose, VEEV was developed as a bioweapon by the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691631/#B14-viruses-09-00279
So it’s desirable because it requires a low infectious dose, and it’s easily aerosolized (airborne transmissible), eh? Hmmm….
At first, I suspected that it might have something to do with some potential molecular signaling that might induce human encephalitis, or potentially inserting a prion causing misfolded protein into our brains. And that potential still lurks in the back of my befuddled mind. But then an acquaintance sent me this link related to a brand-new, very large, BSL-4 lab, NBAF, that just opened in Manhattan, Kansas. BSL-4 is the highest level research safety level that we know of, outside of the movie “The Andromeda Strain”. And it’s a very large facility, costing $1.25 billion to build. That’s not “chicken feed” (pardon the H5N1 reference).
Wildfire underground BSL-”OMG” containment lab. “The Andromeda Strain”:
The article discusses the kinds of viruses they will be researching there:
“In an interview with KMAN, research leader Dr. Chad Mire, with the Foreign Arthropod-Borne Animal Disease Research Unit (also known as FABADRU), noted that the unit has over 60 active research programs and agreements currently underway. That includes research into foreign arboviruses transmitted by mosquitoes and ticks, such as Rift Valley Fever virus and Japanese Encephalitis.
“These are viruses that have never been reported in the United States, but they’ve shown the ability to become established in new areas within the last decade across the globe. So along with that, we’re working on how to predict and mitigate these diseases,” he said. “We’re also working with a virus called Vesicular Stomatitis virus. This virus can be transmitted through biting flies like sandflies, and it can cause cyclical outbreaks here in the U.S.”
https://1350kman.com/2024/04/nbaf-leaders-discuss-early-active-research-underway/
The reference to mosquito-borne viral research immediately brought to mind the VEEV RdRP Replicon issue in the ARCT-154 Virus. Again, why VEEV as the RdRP backbone? And then this thought struck me, given the recent H5N1 infected Dairy Cow in Texas. Dairy cows constantly attract flies and mosquitoes, which feed on their blood. In some cases, such as after a storm or hurricane, hordes of mosquitoes can literally suck these animals dry of their blood, killing them.
Mosquitoes/insects as the sa-mRNA H5N1 fragment vector in livestock?
Based upon the number of articles about the incident, only fragments of H5N1 were identified, conveniently, in the cow’s milk. Fragments, just sufficient to register positive on a PCR test. But serious enough that President Biden needed to be briefed the following week, and various vectors of infection, such as contaminated feedstock being held responsible.
But what if it had nothing to do with birds at all? What if the infection was by way of virally laden mosquito or flies? And what if, just if, those insects were laden with a viral payload made up of multi-protein fragments of H5N1 being replicated by a Self-Amplifying mRNA “vaccine,” one with the RdRP Replicon backbone of a mosquito-borne VEEV RNA virus? One that had evolved to remain viable within a mosquito yet could produce other viral proteins, such as H5N1 fragments?
Yes, I know.. they say they are designed to produce only one singular viral antigen (e.g., Spike). But what would prevent them from synthesizing multiple protein fragments/segments as well, just short of an entire RNA Virus? Just enough to test positive on a PCR test?
This raises some VERY interesting possibilities and questions.
(NOTE: Earlier on the evening of writing this, I’ve been told by highly informed sources that this is, indeed, a plausible scenario.)
The choice of a VEEV mosquito-borne RNA viral RdRP/Replicon, rather than SARS-2, or Influenza, suggests a potential intention to use a viral backbone from a virus already “adapted” to be transfected via a mosquito or fly. I can’t explain such a choice for any other purpose, but maybe there are other considerations behind that decision. All I’m doing is asking the question. If I were trying to replicate SARS-2, or influenza, why would I choose an Encephalitis viral RdRP to replicate it?
Mosquito-borne vectors to transfect livestock with sa-mRNA?
Could sa-mRNA technology be used to synthesize multi-protein viral fragments that are then carried by insect vectors to transfect and generate these viral fragments? Could it be used to create the illusion of actual viral infections? A mosquito would focus on an easy target, such as exposed flesh, say a dairy cow’s udder, in which to obtain its bloody feast. It would not target areas thick with fur, right? And that transfected udder would then commence self-replication of those H5N1 viral particles. And then someone would conveniently test for H5N1 (in a cow’s milk) and it would test positive, right?
Thinking like the Globalist Neo-Feudalists.
Believe me, I fully understand the “tin-foil hat” nature of this hypothesis. It sounds incredible and unbelievable. However, I don’t see anything preventing sa-mRNA from being used in this manner, with the viral “payload” being delivered by a mosquito/fly transfection vector, where it then replicates those fragments multiple times everywhere in the body where their LNP container can cross the cellular membranes. All they require are sufficient viral fragments to trigger a positive PCR test result.
And, in attempting to put myself within their megalomaniacal minds, bent upon destroying “climate change” causing methane emissions, and ESG policies, it certainly something that I would consider. That is, were I providing nefarious advice, as a strategy for increasing control over the global population and its food supply. Forcing people into even more dependence upon them for a contrived solution. For this reason, early treatment, based upon, or a modified version of the Zelenko Protocol, represents the best means of removing their power to spread fear among humanity.
SPECTRE?
As I believe I’ve convincingly shown in Parts 1 & 2, early treatment options were denied to the world for the purpose of protecting their tools of profit and global control, Self-Amplifying mRNA. Millions died to protect the secret vulnerability of these new sa-mRNA vaccines. Human life obviously doesn’t matter to these globalists, I would opine. I’m left believing that we’re dealing with a global criminal James Bond style SPECTRE entity.
Transfecting people with the new sa-mRNA vaccines using insects?
But now the frightening part. If mosquitoes or other biting insects could be used to do this in animals, then it stands to reason it could also be done in humans. We are all occasionally bitten by such insects from time to time. So what would prevent someone from using such an insect vector to transfect humans with either the sa-mRNA vaccine or partial fragments? What if it were used to create prion-like particles self-replicating within us? Prions that can be planted as “seeds” to create even more prions leading to Encephalitis, delivered via the LNPs that encapsulate them? Or suddenly, bitten people show up H5N1 positive on a PCR test? But since they were still alive, this would assume that their immune systems had confronted and dealt with the virus, right? Or what if it were some other form of pathogenic bird flu?
Theoretically speaking, they could attach a chimeric version of the actual H5N1 virus and attach it to that VEEV RdRP/Replicon backbone. It may not be particularly viable, but it could create a massive inflammatory immune response, right? Because that VEEV backbone will still keep replicating its viral proteins, viable or not. So many possible scenarios can be perceived from misuse of these Self-Amplifying mRNA gene therapies (as well as equally positive purposes, such as p53 protein production based upon individual genetic damage that could save millions from the blight of cancer). Like nuclear energy, it has dual-use potential, both positive and negative. It all comes down to trust, and these people have lost that trust by denying early treatment RdRP inhibitors like the Zelenko Protocol and/or Ivermectin.
Is the real target (for now) the livestock and meat industries?
So maybe the target for “Disease X” (H5N1) isn’t the human population (yet), but rather animal livestock. Just one positive PCR test will lead to the culling of entire herds. No one will be permitted to drink raw, unpasteurized milk. Dairies will be forced to shut down due to the excessive expense of new test requirements. Meat cattle ranches will follow. Hogs and pigs next, then poultry, already plagued by H5N1 and other pathogenic avian flu viruses. All possible from H5N1 (or viral fragments) of the H5N1 virus, replicated by Self-Amplifying mRNA technology. Of course, they won’t test the wild animals, so they will be spared, as it’s not really a viable virus in their wild species. But domestic livestock? That’s another story. They will all have to be culled and incinerated out of the fraudulent infections perpetrated by Self-Amplifying mRNA transfections.
If you read the media-generated narratives being pandered about, it’s all focused on cows. But no mention of the 120 MINK farms in the US. Why is that? Why isn’t that perceived as an even greater threat, given their ability to transmit H5N1 to humans (and vice versa), the very reason that their Ferret relatives are used in Gain of Function and Vaccine testing? Not a peep out of the media, the WHO, or CDC about the MINK in Spain and Finland that were infected with the SAME H5N1 viral clade 2.3.4.4b found in those Dairy cows. Yet, we need to be worried about their milk and/or meat?
Will we be relegated to eating their laboratory fake meat?
Companies like “Beyond Meat” in which a certain Redmond, WA Multi-Billionaire computer/virus and newfound vaccine expert has invested. A stock whose price has increased by 25% since the Texas cow infection. Surely, just a coincidence.
Just imagine hordes of sa-mRNA-laden mosquitoes transfecting cattle and other livestock everywhere with H5N1 viral protein segments, causing those animals to test positive for mysterious zoonotic outbreaks of H5N1.
Let the culling begin...
Everything seems grammatically correct now.
But you know how to protect yourselves, and even our livestock. Read “The Baric Files”.
