A twist of fate alters Ron's trajectory in 2008 when his father's diagnosis steers him away from the path of international intrigue. He becomes the caretaker for his parents, receiving unexpected "blood money" that sets the stage for a new chapter – marriage, family, and an unspoken promise to his father.
What if they held a pandemic and no one came? https://apps.nftbooks.info/urls/M3JuxT5
Natural Evolution vs. Engineered Origins
In the early throes of 2020, humanity grappled with a relentless biological onslaught in the form of SARS-CoV-2, an RNA virus deemed "novel." Yet, it was intricately linked to the 2003 SARS-CoV-1 strain that had afflicted Hong Kong, Singapore, and other Asian countries, ultimately resulting in the deaths of some 774 lives. Despite sharing genetic traits, this newfound virus defied convention with its extraordinary transmissibility among humans, a departure from the norm for emerging viruses. Notably, it exhibited a strong affinity for binding to the human ACE2 receptor, a pivotal interaction facilitating the injection of its viral RNA into human cells—echoing its predecessor.
This affinity for the ACE2 receptor has only been seen in SARS-CoV-1 and now SARS-CoV-2, making it highly intriguing. This is especially true given the increasing realization that SARS-CoV-2 may not have originated from natural zoonotic sources. A twist of genetic variation rendered it "novel," shrouding its origins in ambiguity. Global health authorities fervently championed the natural origin hypothesis, dismissing compelling evidence hinting at human engineering. Even now, four years on, the contentious debate persists—a relentless struggle between the theory of natural mutation and the specter of deliberate genetic manipulation through Gain of Function experiments within a biolab.
The quest for a definitive answer endures, fueled not merely by a desire for understanding but by a pressing need to assign blame, mete out just punishment, and fortify defenses against the recurrence of such a perilous event. The shadows of uncertainty linger as humanity seeks clarity in a narrative that could shape its future in the fight against RNA viruses like SARS-CoV-2.
- Against this backdrop, I embarked on a quest for knowledge to confront the looming viral menace.
The Origins and Implications of Viral Threats in a Globalized World
Yet, assuming we unearthed the true origin, how would that knowledge aid us in combating these viral adversaries? The ability to craft pathogenic viruses has spread so widely that it no longer dwells solely within the confines of government research labs. Any well-funded entity, be it a university, or covert private laboratory, could pursue similar research for both benevolent and malevolent motives. If formidable enough, they might conceivably infiltrate and covertly exploit government biolabs, operating under the guise of clandestine dual-use endeavors. Much like nuclear fission, the power to either benefit, or annihilate humanity lies within. The same holds true for research into biological pathogens. Possessing the knowledge and means to wield such threats against nations, or the entire planet with a dual-use pathogen has evolved into a grave menace to humanity as a whole.
Biowarfare - SARS-2 and the Perilous Calculations of its Creators
Thus, armed with my conviction in the artificial origin of SARS-2, I pondered whether a psychopathic individual, or entity would gamble on releasing a pathogen that could jeopardize their own lives, or those dear to them. How, I wondered, would these biological ‘puppet masters’ shield themselves from such infectivity? It seemed logical for them to possess the knowledge and tools to mitigate their vulnerability to the very bioweapons they sought to unleash. This, in essence, was the pressing query that consumed me in the spring of 2020. If someone engineered SARS-2 as a bioweapon, they must have devised the means to defuse it. Alternatively, it suggested that the perceived danger might not be as dire as propagated and was actually a sinister propaganda operation to invoke fear and economic damage across the planet. But who would have such a motive, or hope to profit from it? These were my thoughts at that time, upon which my research delved.
The Dual Nature of Virus Research and the Intricate Dance of Lethality and Transmissibility
In time, I've come to acknowledge that both scenarios held elements of truth. They did, indeed, explore ways to shield themselves from RNA viruses, as claimed in the context of mRNA vaccine research. Simultaneously, they understood that, while lethal in the initial phase of the pandemic's expansion, with each mutation, the virus became less lethal yet more transmissible. The imperative of its genetic programming is to replicate. Causing the death of the host hampers that objective. Viruses, through mutation, evolve to disseminate widely, not to extinguish their carriers. Pathogenic viruses that quickly kill “burn out” and don’t transmit their genes, which puts an end to their virulence.
Censorship, Quest for Truth, and the Perpetual Dance with Narrative Control
In any quest, having trailblazers and allies, even if only in a virtual sense through social media, proves beneficial. As censorship of "misinformation" intensified across the internet, a discernible pattern emerged—those most frequently censored often presented the most credible information and posed probing questions. Focusing on these individuals, critical thinking compelled an inquiry into the reasons behind their suppression and censorship. Thus, a significant part of my journey involved sifting through a vast expanse of ‘dirt’ in the hope of uncovering a few ‘gems’ of wisdom.
In the early days of spring 2020, a palpable effort materialized to control the narrative and instill fear in the populace. It appeared that the media, and their overseers, sought to prevent deviation from the carefully laid trail of breadcrumbs, orchestrated by our ostensibly ‘trusted’ officials from Orwell's ‘Ministry of Truth’. This subterfuge, I observe, has endured unabated to the present day. In fact, I believe that it will grow even stronger as Artificial Intelligence broadens its grasp over our lives. AI is also a double-edged sword, bearing benefit as well as danger to our freedoms.
Influential Figures in Pandemic Analysis and Medical Education
The voices of clarity and critical thinking deserve mention, though a comprehensive tribute would demand a separate work. Nevertheless, a select few remarkable individuals warrant acknowledgment here for their profound impact on my thinking and research endeavors. To this day, they persist in providing concise and objective analyses.
Firstly, Del Bigtree's "The Highwire" served as a rich source of information covering the vaccine industry comprehensively. It delved into the flaws and controversies surrounding not only the proposed mRNA vaccines but also other therapeutic treatments, such as the contentious HCQ, and many more. Drawing from their expertise in prior vaccines and their potential hazards, coupled with a stark awareness of corruption and fraud within the pharmaceutical industry, Del significantly aided me in posing critical questions. This assistance proved invaluable in making informed decisions regarding the merits and risks associated with various vaccines and alternative treatments.
A sincere thanks is owed to Dr. Chris Martenson for his analytical approach grounded in science and data. His series of incisive and well- argued presentations on the pandemic became essential viewing with each episode. Dr. Martenson, armed with a background in Pathology, brought forth curiosity, training, and knowledge to not only explore the pandemic response but also analyze and elucidate the virus's structure, potential origin, and later, the global research studies on early treatment and prevention. He was among the pioneers delving deeply into the HCQ issue, a topic to be extensively covered in subsequent chapters, leading to his censorship by social media platforms. In the midst of global panic and propaganda, Chris emerged as a voice of objective reason and analytical science-based insight.
Dr. Mobeen "DrBeen" Sayed, a prominent figure among the burgeoning Medical Education channels on YouTube, stands out as another noteworthy source. His channel delved into recent reports and studies with meticulous attention, often accompanied by illustrations aiding non- medical viewers in grasping the intricacies of viruses and potential therapeutics. His exceptional skill lies in simplifying highly complex medical subjects for the layperson’s comprehension.
Finally, the utmost credit goes to Dr. Roger Seheult, the co-creator of the medical YouTube channel, MedCram, whose every new episode led viewers on a journey of knowledge and understanding. I avidly consumed each presentation he posted in those initial years. Recently, I've engaged in several exchanges with Dr. Seheult on the X platform (formerly Twitter). Despite any minor disagreements, I hold immense respect for him and owe him a considerable debt, as will be elucidated later. Trained as a Critical Care Pulmonary Specialist, Sleep Specialist, and Medical Professor, Dr. Seheult possesses unique qualifications to delve into the intricate realms of Molecular Biology, immunity, and the devastation caused by the SARS-2 virus in those early months. It was his series of videos, particularly MedCram Update 32 and 34, still available for viewing, that would ultimately alter the course of history and unveil the "secret" research on alternative early treatment for RNA viruses.
It's worth noting that all these presenters, to a lesser extent Dr. Seheult, have faced concerted censorship from various social media platforms, notably Facebook, the pre-Elon Musk Twitter, and YouTube. They've frequently been accused of disseminating ‘misinformation’, despite presenting peer-reviewed scientific research papers generally regarded as credible by the scientific community.
Finally, I express gratitude to Jay Couey, whose early videos on microbiology initiated my education on the obscure techniques of viral "gain of function." He introduced me to the method of ‘passaging’ between physically separated ferrets, sharing the same atmosphere, as a means of rendering a virus airborne and transmissible between them. I attribute to him the opening of an entirely new realm of research that will unfold later in this work. In essence, numerous individuals, both named and anonymous, have contributed to the continual expansion of my knowledge in the arcane domains of virology and vaccinology. This work you are currently reading owes them all a great debt in leading us to clarity on the nature of the viral threat, as well as the cure.
There are many more individuals who greatly contributed, paving the way for the creation of PROTOCOL-Z. Doctors who advocated for alternative, early treatment solutions, such as Drs. George Fareed, Brian Tyson, Peter McCullough, Richard Urso, Pierre Kory, and Paul Marik, Xavier Azalbert and even more too numerous to acknowledge here. However, they know who they are and what they have contributed to saving the lives of so many.
De Oppresso Liber