Baric's Zinc Revelation: Part 2
Mind-Bending Research Revealed!
Thanks!! This site is powered by Caffeine and Plasma rifles.
Synopsis
The investigation into ACE2 uncovered a remarkable finding: its classification as a Zinc Metalloprotease suggests that Zinc likely holds a pivotal role in its function and structure. This revelation prompted a deep dive into Zinc's importance in cellular processes, particularly concerning virus entry, with a focus on its impact on SARS-1 and SARS-2.
Reflecting on Ralph Baric's exploration of Zinc's potential to impede RNA viral replication, I contemplate its potential application in early treatment methods. I suggest that a temporary boost in Zinc levels, coupled with a Zinc Ionophore, could potentially hinder RNA virus replication, thereby potentially dampening hyperactive inflammatory responses characteristic of diseases like COVID-19.
I also question the potential suppression of such research by pharmaceutical interests, hinting at the value of exploring natural, over-the-counter alternatives like Hydroxy-Chloroquine for combating viral infections. However, I emphasize the necessity of judicious Zinc supplementation, highlighting the risks of excessive intake leading to toxicity and physiological disruptions.
Treatment
Recently, during my research into ACE2, I made an intriguing discovery: ACE2 is a Zinc Metalloprotease. This means that Zinc likely constitutes the fundamental metallic element in its structure and, consequently, its function. While this may initially seem like a mere coincidence, it prompted me to contemplate the role of Zinc and its mechanisms within our cells, particularly in relation to virus entry.
For the past four years, I was completely unaware of Zinc's role in the formation of ACE2. Not being a virologist or biochemist, it's challenging for me to ascertain the importance, if any, of this fact. However, it certainly raised my eyebrows – an interesting coincidence, considering there are only two known viruses that target ACE2 in humans: SARS-1 and SARS-2. Moreover, Baric was studying Zinc's potential role in blocking RNA viral replication. This finding, and Ralph Baric’s research focus RNA viruses, like SARS-1 & 2, which bind to ACE2, has led me to wonder about the exact reason that drove the eminent Dr. Ralph Baric and his team to make this short, but critically important diversion from his normal research trajectory.
It has been known for decades that Zinc has antiviral, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal properties. Zinc also plays a significant role in controlling the spread of cancerous tumors within our bodies, involving its role in the activation of the p53 “guardian of the genome” p53 protein. Over 300 different enzymes within our bodies depend upon sufficiency of Zinc. Though young adults only require trace amounts of Zinc each day (less than 15mg), that little bit apparently goes a long way in boosting our immune system, and without it, we are prone to immunological dysfunction, making us vulnerable both pathogens, and cancer. And as we age, our bodies become less able to utilize the available Zinc, so its recommended that that normal RDA be increased.
Bottom line: Don’t be Zinc deficient.
A wealth of Zinc related data and research can be found at the Linus Pauling Institute, based at Oregon State University:
Looking back at the prior article, where Ralph Baric used Zinc, in combination with Pyrithione acting as the Zinc Ionophore, he was able to cause Zinc to increase its concentration within human cells infected with various RNA viruses. As noted in the prior article, Pyrithione is derived as an extract from the Persian Shallot plant. Though it’s molecule has been synthetized, it is based upon the naturally occurring molecule in that little onion. An all-natural Zinc ionophore for the purpose of temporarily boosting intracellular Zinc levels, where it disrupts RNA Viral RdRP. Using an ionophore can temporarily overrides the cell’s natural restrictions to normal long-term internal Zinc concentrations. It’s been assumed that this physiological restriction exists so that excess Zinc doesn’t disrupt long-term normal protein synthesis by our RNA Polymerase (see previous article).
But we want to restrict, inhibit, and/or block RNA Viral RNA dependent RNA Polymerase (RdRP), do we not? If the RNA virus cannot replicate, or its replication slowed down, then our natural immunity has time to provide a normal immune response does it not? Would this help mitigate the hyperactive inflammatory storms that are what Covid actually represents? The virus doesn’t put us in the hospital. Our immunological “scorched earth” defense strategy to that virus is what puts people in the ICU.
In a monumental video released on March 10th, 2020, Dr. Roger Seheult, known for his YouTube channel, MedCram, as well as being a Critical Care Pulmonologist and Medical Professor, presented his seminal analysis in 'Update #34,' which ultimately changed the world forever. Buckle up and be prepared for some heavy, but well explained, microbiology on how RNA viruses work, and why Ralph Baric’s research paper is so important. And you will discover that Chloroquine is a Zinc Ionophore, just like Pyrithione.
It’s only 12 minutes long, but this analysis literally laid the foundation for EARLY treatment options for SARS-2. Take the time to view it.. It will make everything else more understandable in this, and future articles.
It's possible that Dr. Seheult's perception of the analysis may not have been influenced significantly by Dr. Baric's credentials and reputation, particularly if he is strict about relying on evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Since RCTs typically involve controlled environments and are often conducted on hospitalized patients, they may not directly address the early treatment approach advocated by Dr. Baric, which focuses on blocking RdRP upon initial presentation of symptoms like fever. Additionally, Dr. Seheult might prioritize evidence from RCTs over the reputation of individual researchers, regardless of their expertise in RNA viral studies such as Dr. Baric's.
In May 2020, I was the first individual to publicly connect the discussed paper in the Medcram video with Dr. Ralph Baric. Recognizing the significance of this connection, particularly in relation to the controversial 'Zelenko Protocol' (as discussed in a future article), I made it my life mission to reveal this association to anyone willing to listen. I hinted at its implications for combating all RNA viruses and shed light on what I perceive as surprises planned by the global pharmaceutical cabal, which is currently underway as I type this.
To substantiate this claim, find my my pinned tweet on X(Twitter) from that day.
Truly remarkable, is it not?
When I first discovered this connection to Ralph Baric, it left my mind reeling, trying to comprehend the implications, especially concerning Big Pharma and their efforts to discredit the use of HCQ. Could we potentially achieve the same results using all-natural ingredients available over the counter?
However, as a word of caution, there’s mentioned above, there’s a very good reason our bodies limit intracellular Zinc levels. “Remember that RNA Polymerase that helps create the proteins our bodies require to function?”
It is very likely that long periods of excess Zinc would ALSO inhibit its function. It's crucial to understand that long-term excess Zinc in our cells, beyond a short period (such as a month), can be toxic to our bodies and lead to physiological dysfunction. We require just the right amount, typically no more than 15mg/day, to meet our body's needs. Additionally, our bodies have developed various mechanisms to remove excess Zinc before it can cause harm. But this also has consequences. So, it's important not to assume that taking 100mg of Zinc per day will be beneficial.
It won't.
However, deductive logic suggests were a newly infected individual to temporarily use extra Zinc supplementation (for a week, at the onset of symptoms) along with a Zinc Ionophore, could it inhibit the replication of ALL RNA viruses, including those cited above?
Perhaps using a low-cost, very safe substance like Hydroxy-Chloroquine (HCQ)? After all, HCQ, or its natural form, Quinine, has been a common anti-malarial drug widely used for centuries. Could it be akin to hitting the "nitrous switch" on your immunological "race car," speeding you to a quicker recovery from a viral infection?
But was this the reason as to why why HCQ was so heavily restricted and demonized for the past four years? I’m pretty certain that I have 'stumbled' across the real answer, and it’s not what most people would expect. Billions of dollars and years of research were at stake. And Baric’s research HAD TO BE SUPPRESSED, lest that investment and their plans be unraveled.
But for that article, I will request a paid subscription. I hope that with the free 'teasers' I am providing, you are convinced that my four years of research and analysis have uncovered something monumental for all humanity when it comes to RNA viruses.
"It will be worth the price of admission. I promise. It may also put a bullseye on me by Big Pharma and TPTB. But it must be spoken, and I sincerely request your support."
"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." - J. Robert Oppenheimer